就在与谷歌达成协议的前几天（2月24日），Meta 刚刚向 AMD 砸下了一份震撼业界的定海神针：承诺在未来五年内采购价值高达 600 亿美元的 AI 芯片。为了深度绑定，Meta 甚至换取了最高可达 1600 万股的 AMD 股权认购权。
Материалы по теме:，更多细节参见safew官方下载
# Export as CSV。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
Try our other sports emails: there’s daily football news and gossip in The Fiver, and weekly catch-ups for cricket in The Spin and rugby union in The Breakdown.
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?